|
DSCN1921
Nope, don't look any better from this angle 8^)
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 760
|
DSCN1930
The coils removed.
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 788
|
DSCN1931
These coils were wrapped in a black gooy (what appears to be friction tape) that was oil soaked and was a big thorn in my butt to remove. Due to the age of the coils I dared not get to brutal with them and had to be ginger with them.
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 732
|
|
DSCN1932
Damn, my hands get dirty just looking at this again, LMAO.
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 686
|
DSCN1940
I found several numbers throughout the motor that we hope will help Myles ID and date this motor/car better. These were wrapped into the coils.
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 681
|
DSCN1945
Sometimes being gingerly don't work, and that's when I gut them like a fish 8^o
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 716
|
|
DSCN1946
It's funny but GE still uses this wire size today, although on their smaller motors.
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 702
|
DSCN1954
I believe this was a pic from the third time a baked the pole shoes to get the oil out of them. I lost count how many times it took to where it stopped oozing out, lmao.
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 807
|
DSCN1955
After dipping and baking, and a fresh turn and undercut the old gals starting to look good. I hated to coat it in red, but the insulation was very dry and brittle and then gummed up from this friction tape/oil gunk, and really wanted to lock it down for
Date: 12/31/1969
Owner: Jim Husted
Views: 827
|
